I don’t like Biden either, but anyone with half a brain knows there are two choices in the 2020 election. If we had a sane voting system, voting third party might be worth it, but as it stands, no one but you knows your favorite candidate exists and unless you want to become their campaign manager that will still be true in November. Even if you did, and even if you convinced two thirds of the people who would otherwise have voted for Biden to vote for your chosen candidate instead, Trump would still win because half the country voted for him and your guy only got a third. If you vote third party you might as well stay home.

Not voting isn’t going to stop the genocide in Gaza. The US will continue to funnel them arms no matter which candidate wins this November. Trump practically campaigns on how much he hates the Jews and he’s publicly told Israel to “finish up their war”. He’ll also make life a living hell for anyone who isn’t a straight cisgender male back here at home.

A vote for a candidate is not an endorsement of them or their policies, it’s a statement that you like their policies more than the other guy’s, and “sticking it to liberals” and “refusing to support genocide” (that’s not what voting for Biden is doing, by the way – a vote for either candidate is a vote for genocide and a vote for neither is an endorsement of both) is not more important than keeping the furthest right politician America has ever seen out of office.

How incredibly privileged do you have to be to see an entire national election as what will happen in the Middle East and ignore Trump’s campaign promises to wipe transgender Americans off the map, and further, to not realize that the same thing will happen in the Middle East regardless of which candidate wins?

I hate Biden as much as every other leftist here. But I’ll still vote for him because Trump is worse. If there’s a single bone in your body that cares about the lives of your trans friends you will too.

    • catharso@discuss.tchncs.de
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      6 months ago

      Assassinate 'em, you say?

      No, just kidding.

      I’m just someone watching from Europe, getting a little concerned 😔

      • Tar_Alcaran@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        6 months ago

        Same here. Watching from Europe, and going “hmm, I think we had a few very bloody revolutions to solve these kinds of problems”

  • Thief_of_Crows@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    6 months ago

    Why dont you pressure Biden to stop genociding people then? I have a hard and fast rule about genocide, sorry but present day me doesn’t make the rules about who I vote for.

    • Vent@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      6 months ago

      Do you believe Trump/Republicans will decrease, maintain, or increase the current genocide levels?

  • InternetUser2012@midwest.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    6 months ago

    This will be the most important election in the history of the united states. You have two choices, Dictator, or Democracy. A no vote is a vote AGAINST Democracy.

    • Mikesomething@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      6 months ago

      I hear this every single election.

      Dems - “democracy is at stake! THIS IS THE SINGLE MOST IMPORTANT ELECTION IN YOUR LIFE”

      Me - *Holds nose and votes for the lesser evil"

      Dems - “thanks guys that was close” Proceeds to sit around with a thumb in their collective asshole for 4 years.

      Dems - “Democracy is at stake! REALLY guys - THIS is the most important election ever!”

      It’s fucking exhausting. If the Dems really wanted people to come out and vote, they would spend less time begging for our votes, and more time representing our collective interests.

      • mojo_raisin@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        6 months ago

        I hear this every single election.

        1. Because as we move into the future with a larger population and worse environmental destruction, the stakes become greater.

        2. Because we’ve been on the verge of losing our democracy for a couple decades now. I’m almost 50, we’ve been on the verge since the presidency was taken from Al Gore. It was not this way before that in my lifetime.

        You think one election is going to take a nation on the brink to being in safe harbors? This is a battle for democracy that occurs over multiple elections, why is that so hard to understand? You can only repeat what your friends say?

    • Zagorath@aussie.zone
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      6 months ago

      No, not in FPTP. You vote for the candidate who you least disagree with out of those with a reasonable chance of victory, or you waste your vote.

      • CabbageRelish@midwest.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        edit-2
        6 months ago

        So… by voting my conscience I don’t get a vote? I was literally brought up with the idea that if enough people pressure one of the parties one way or the other they might start embracing your ideas. And that was supposed to be how this worked.

        • subignition@fedia.io
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          6 months ago

          The time to advance your ideas is everywhen except the presidential election, basically. At this timing, voting your conscience will really only be contributing to the spoiler effect.

  • ZombiFrancis@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    6 months ago

    a vote for either candidate is a vote for genocide

    Demanding people vote for genocide as a lesser of two evils is where we are at now.

        • Gnome Kat@lemmy.blahaj.zone
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          6 months ago

          Is Trump gonna genocide harder or something?

          I mean… yes… yes he would definitely support escalation of the killings. He has stated he thinks they aren’t going far enough so trump would 100% just encourage full genocide openly

          Biden is at least turning on this issue, though obviously it’s way too little and too late… but he is at least reachable and is now saying there needs to be a ceasefire.

          Is biden doing enough? Fuck no.

          Should he step down and let other dems run? I think yes… I would feel so much better if we had a candidate who hasn’t been supporting this for as long as biden has.

          But would trump be worse on this issues? Absolutely things can get so much worse…