A 10-year-old boy who was swept into a storm drain while helping his family clean up storm debris is being kept on life support so that his organs can be donated, according to his father.

The boy, Asher Sullivan, “officially passed away” on May 18, but remains on life support to facilitate the organ donation process, his dad, Jimmy Sullivan, wrote in a Facebook post.

“It’s 100% an ‘Asher’ type thing to do in continuing to be selfless,” Sullivan shared  on Facebook. “He will have an honor walk at the hospital in the next few days and be celebrated as he is, a hero!”

    • tiredofsametab@kbin.run
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      3 months ago

      I mean, why else would you sweep children into drains?

      RIP little dude. My cousin died around the same age and also became an organ donor.

  • robocall@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    3 months ago

    The kid is going to save a lot of other lives by being an organ donor. I have no idea why people would opt out of being a donor.

      • cobysev@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        3 months ago

        My father did this. He signed up for his body to be donated to science. He always told me, the minute he passes, there’s a card in his wallet with a phone number. Just call them and they’ll come out to pick up his body. That’s it; no funeral or anything. He didn’t believe in wasting money on a funeral or burial plot/coffin after he was dead. When they’re done with their research, they’ll return his cremated remains to us.

        Sadly, I had to call that number a few months ago.

      • Thunderbird4@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        3 months ago

        Are you in the US? I wouldn’t dissuade anyone from being an organ donor, it’s obviously a great necessity and saves thousands of lives, but I’m always amazed that the bottomless skepticism of our for-profit healthcare system dries up on certain topics.

        We all love to moan about greedy health insurance companies and hospital administrations putting profit above the actual health of patients and outcomes of procedures, so why is it taken for granted that, when faced with a decision to go to extraordinary lengths to save a badly injured, uninsured person, or get expensive organs for 3 or 4 insured people at the top of the recipient list, that the responsible parties will make the right decision? Hell, even without a profit motive, that can be a difficult decision that can be influenced by personal beliefs and biases.

        I certainly don’t know enough about exactly how these decisions are made to have a strong opinion, but I don’t think it’s fair to characterize potentially warranted skepticism as moronic.