• Possibly linux@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    2 months ago

    They could just accept GTK 4. Anyway, they will need some GTK 4/libadwaita support as there are an increasing number of apps that use it.

    • therealjcdenton@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      2 months ago

      Hello fellow citizen, I almost agree but libadwaita is inherently gnome’s thing, and libadwaita apps are usually closely built into the gnome desktop, so using it outside of gnome seems weird. Kinda like using Dolphin outside of KDE (tho that’s just because of qt). They want to be able to integrate their forks visually.

  • danielfgom@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    2 months ago

    The enshitification of Gnome continues until it be it’s own little isolated thing and previous gnome code will have to be forked to make progress that users actually want.

    That will probably go for gnome apps eventually. The Mint guys might have to rewrite all the bloody apps to work with gnome 3…🤦

    • schnurrito@discuss.tchncs.de
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      2 months ago

      Didn’t that happen a long time ago which is how we got MATE?

      I no longer follow developments in GTK based DEs much because nowadays KDE Plasma is so clearly the best choice for me, but it has long been my impression that GNOME just wants to be its own thing that doesn’t really care about anyone not using GNOME. This is probably because the main role of GNOME is to be the DE for installations commercially supported by Canonical, Red Hat, etc.

    • Pussista@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 months ago

      It’s not up to GNOME to do others work for them. If Mint wants a specific styling for their desktop, they should fork it (which they’re already doing) since everything is open source. It’s not like GNOME is gonna hunt them down for forking and creating a new product altogether lmfao. Cut the crap.

      • danielfgom@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        2 months ago

        Gnome Foundation likes to think of themselves as the pioneer in DE’s and the default choice for Linux. Which was true for a long time. Cinnamon and Mate run Gnome, for example. I’m not sure about XFCE.

        If you’re THE leading DE project at least try to accommodate those DE’s that depend on your code or meet with them to inform them well in advance and discuss the best options for those DE’s.

        In other words, work together for the good of all users instead of doing your own little thing in the corner and leave the others to deal with the mess you made…

    • MrSoup@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      2 months ago

      TL;DR They want to push even more other desktop environments and distros to use XApps, because a lot of gnome’s ex-gtk3 apps now are half-broken and looks alien inside Mint and other distros like Xubuntu.

      If an application doesn’t support Cinnamon we can’t ship with it in our Cinnamon edition. The same goes for MATE and Xfce.
      […]
      We could do like Ubuntu 24.04. They provide a finished product with a high level of integration. The way they do that is by modifying libAdwaita to support their theme: Yaru. We could do the same with Mint-Y. It would make all GNOME applications look nice in Linux Mint, but we’d have to remove theme selection, since it would only work with Mint-Y. In the long term it wouldn’t solve the main issue either: These applications are designed for a desktop which is more and more different to ours by the day. It’s not just a question of themes or look. Today these apps are losing menubars, themes, tomorrow they might come with no minimize button or anything GNOME doesn’t use.

  • neonred@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    2 months ago

    Once in a while I check the installed packages for a possible dependency on GTK and when I find a program which has one, I look for an alternative to have one dependency less.

    The last time I replaced simple-scan with skanlite and it is a much much better scanning program and with a more pleasant ui on top.

        • Pantherina@feddit.de
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          2 months ago

          I am not using Mint and it is also in the Fedora repos, but there is no reason for it to not be on Flathub. Maybe when I find the time I try to package it.

          • Fonzie!@ttrpg.network
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            2 months ago

            Honestly, for me, if it’s available from my OS’s repos and not horribly out of date, I use that one.

            I’d rather have my app just work, not consume twice the resources and actually listen to my theme (inc the mouse, somehow)

              • Fonzie!@ttrpg.network
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                26 days ago

                bazzite defaults to the Breeze cursor

                I changed it to the Breeze Light cursor

                Flatpaks (so 90% of graphical stuff on bazzite) show me the Breeze (dark) cursor

                I experienced the same on Debian KDE

                It does not work fine on all KDE Plasmas, but it sure must be great for some KDE Plasma users out there that their cursor theme works in Flatpak

                Still eats ludicrous amounts of resources and makes file management and sharing through the app a bitch, either way

  • MrSoup@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    2 months ago

    Can’t they theme gtk4/libadwaita without editing libadwaita? Like gradience do

    I’ve made a bunch of libadwaita apps, because I like its UI/UX not because I want to break other Desktop Environment. That would mean even more fragmentation.

    • lemmyvore@feddit.nl
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 months ago

      If they did you’d have one theme that works with Gnome and one that works with Mint. Both of which would be irrelevant to someone using GTK apps on, say, XFCE on Arch.

        • Ashtefere@aussie.zone
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          2 months ago

          Libadwaita is only compatible with gnome and only works with gnome. Other DE’s can try to make it work in their DE, but the experience for them is hostile.

          To put it mildly, gnome devs are being dicks about it as much as they can be, because they consider themselves the only “real” desktop environment to Linux.

          If you want your apps to be cross platform, you can just use gtk3/gtk4 instead, or any other ui library. Even QT.

          I use gnome ATM because I think paperwm is the best desktop experience on any OS, but the gnome DE devs are just assholes and they break my heart.

          • MrSoup@lemmy.zip
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            edit-2
            2 months ago

            I use Gnome too and I don’t like their attitude against other DEs. Their attitude is becoming a real threat to Linux interoperability.
            At least we got flatpaks.