Thank fuck. This man can go down in history as the savior of the Republic if he fucks off and endorses someone else.

    • themeatbridge@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      10
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      edit-2
      4 days ago

      Because it takes time to build a national campaign. You need 50 different states to sign off on the ballots. The DNC can basically hand-pick a candidate, but they would basically be telling every primary voter to get fucked.

      There would be legal challenges in 50 different states, and the GOP only needs one activist judge (and they have 6 on the SCOTUS).

      The last time there was a brokered convention was 1952.

      Plus, who? Who is the dream candidate? Who is so widely appealing that they would be unanimously accepted by the Democratic party leadership and the voters? Who has the leadership qualities, the experience, the confidence, the name recognition, and the credentials to beat the shit out of Trump? And where the fuck have they been?

          • APassenger@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            4 days ago

            Hard to say. He didn’t look like a great candidate until he was Prez.

            I’m not saying let’s throw caution to the wind or let’s make a huge mess.

            Only that it can has happened and worked. It does not mean it will ever again.

    • scarabine@lemmynsfw.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      4 days ago

      Because it’s a huge undertaking and there are different times for ballot eligibility in every one of the 50 states. When do you think the candidate would be chosen? This week? Ready in the wings already and on the ballots?

      These bureaucracies move at such a slow pace there was legitimate concern that BIDEN wouldn’t be on the ballot in time because the DNC wasn’t moving quick enough. That was months ago.

      Furthermore there’s the wheels of public opinion and moving those in lockstep with the speed it would take to create an alternative is something that takes so long that candidates often begin campaigning the year before the primaries.

      There is no other candidate and this is not a personal take but a logistical one. It’s too late.

        • grue@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          6
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          4 days ago

          You know the states make their own rules about who’s allowed to be on the ballot, right?

          • Bonskreeskreeskree@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            4 days ago

            I’m sure the people not voting for trump will know the name of the person to write in after campaign advertisements are done dumping millions into states they won’t make ballot.

            • grue@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              4 days ago

              Yes, giving up both the incumbent advantage and the “having your fucking name on the ballot instead of being a write-in” advantage is definitely a foolproof path to victory! I see no flaws in this plan!