• Roflmasterbigpimp@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    18
    ·
    1 month ago

    You can’t “defeat” AI. It’s not an organization or a group to fight against; it’s technological progress.

    The weavers’ uprisings didn’t stop the Industrial Revolution either. AI is a tool, and those who learn to handle and adapt to it the fastest will be the ones who fare the best.

    • anton@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      16
      ·
      1 month ago

      The weavers fought the capitalist system not industrial progress with the weaving machines being the easiest target as the where expensive to build, but highly profitable.

      Same here: The goal is the overcoming of capitalism but until then we can annoy them by messing with their new toys.

    • ZILtoid1991@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      13
      ·
      1 month ago

      People said the same about NFTs, and they suddenly disappeared…

      With enough “bullying”, we can force the genie back into its lamp. We just need to learn more from anti-GMO karens.

      • thawed_caveman@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        14
        ·
        edit-2
        1 month ago

        It’s not even a matter of bullying: NFTs disappeared because they were fundamentally not viable, and there’s a good chance that generative AI is also not viable.

        Generating an output is extremely computationally expensive, which is a problem because you need several attempts to get an acceptable output (at least in terms of images). This service can’t stay free or cheap forever, and once it starts being expensive, that’s also a problem in itself since generative AI is most suited to generate large amounts of low-profit content.

        For example, earlier this month, Deviantart highlighted a creator that they claimed to be one of their highest earners; they made $25k “in less than a year”, which is not much for the highest earner, and they did it by posting over NINE THOUSAND images in that time. They were selling exlusives for less than $10.

        The only way this makes sense is if it’s really cheap to generate that many images. Even a moderate price, multiplied by 9000, multiplied by the number of attempts each time, would have destroyed their already middling profit.

      • mindbleach@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 month ago

        NFTs were a straight-up scam. The wire mother of wire fraud.

        The only reason crypto almost-sorta-kinda works is that nearly anything works as a medium of exchange so long as it’s fungible. Which is the F those Ts were N.