Assuming there’s nothing stopping you from legally voting

  • DudeImMacGyver@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    2 months ago

    When those are the only two options, fuck yeah: Picking nothing is way worse than picking the least bad option. You’ll be either the metaphorical shit regardless, why risk worse?

    • ShepherdPie@midwest.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      2 months ago

      Continuing to vote against the other candidate rather than voting for who you want allows them to keep doing worse and worse because that other party is always going to be there and always considered worse and supporters of that party will look at the other side and do the same. There is zero accountability for either side to the point where both candidates now openly support genocide and you have people arguing that “you’re a piece of shit for not supporting them.”

      By continuing to vocally support eating shit, you’re ensuring that in a few elections we’ll be supporting eating shit and lighting ourselves on fire because the other side will be eating shit, lighting ourselves on fire, and giving a rim job to a horse. To support our current system is to support a race to the bottom.

      • DudeImMacGyver@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        2 months ago

        People can and should criticize flaws, but to not vote because you don’t like either choice solves absolutely nothing, guaranteeing only that things will get worse. Your argument simply does not hold up and you’re arguing against something I never claimed.

        We should continue to push for and work towards things like ranked choice voting, but letting the worst of the worst win is guaranteed to prevent progress.