• ThePerfectLink@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    7
    ·
    2 months ago

    If radical change is what’s necessary. Then civil wars should be on the table. Besides, I’m sure the shooter’s goal wasn’t to depolarize the masses.

    • solsangraal@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      2 months ago

      “civil war” in this country = the US military vs the side that gets obliterated inside of 1 week. the question is which side they will pick

        • solsangraal@lemmy.zip
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          2 months ago

          it’s the people who are trying to STOP change, or undo it, who are talking about civil war.

          • ThePerfectLink@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            2 months ago

            Yah I mean, if your narrow understanding of what war is is Trumpets trying to take over the white house than yah, I guess one would hate the idea of using violence for the greater good.

            • solsangraal@lemmy.zip
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              2 months ago

              so…given the implication that you have a broad comprehensive understanding of war, your solution is that we should just assassinate people we disagree with? make them martyrs?

              gtfo dude