• Lost_My_Mind@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    212
    ·
    2 months ago

    Any time a bill claims to be about protecting children, 10/10 times it’s actually hiding something more sinister that has nothing to do with that. I don’t trust this.

    • Ultraviolet@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      70
      ·
      edit-2
      2 months ago

      You’d be right in this case too. It’s extremely sketchy, it’s pretty much absolute censorship power with only an informal promise that it won’t be used for anything nefarious (but a refusal to actually codify anything preventing that). “Harmful content” is left very conveniently vague.

        • 0laura@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          12
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          2 months ago

          if they decide that treating the “transgendereds” like people is “harmful to children” then it’ll be banned.

    • sylver_dragon@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      50
      ·
      2 months ago

      The Crypto Wars have never ended. Governments dream of a world without public access to encryption and privacy. And many government attacks on encryption are done “for the children”.

    • ZILtoid1991@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      6
      ·
      2 months ago

      It just addresses some stuff that legit sounds nice out of context, and it’s also covered in the “protect the children” package, so if you’re not voting on it, you want to put the children into danger. Same with the Hungarian anti-LGBT bill.