alphacyberranger@sh.itjust.works to Uplifting News@lemmy.worldEnglish · 2 months agoU.S. proposes ban on airline fees for seating parents next to kidswww.cbsnews.comexternal-linkmessage-square90fedilinkarrow-up1649arrow-down17
arrow-up1642arrow-down1external-linkU.S. proposes ban on airline fees for seating parents next to kidswww.cbsnews.comalphacyberranger@sh.itjust.works to Uplifting News@lemmy.worldEnglish · 2 months agomessage-square90fedilink
minus-squareDoucheBagMcSwag@lemmy.dbzer0.comlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up11arrow-down2·2 months agoInb4 the airline companies cry “Chevron” and the Supreme Court gets to decide strike it down.
minus-squareNateNate60@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up3arrow-down1·2 months agoThat’s not what the Chevron doctrine was. The Chevron doctrine stated that courts should defer to agency interpretations of the law.
minus-squaretea@lemmy.todaylinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·2 months agoOnly in cases of ambiguity or a gap in the law on record.
Inb4 the airline companies cry “Chevron” and the Supreme Court gets to
decidestrike it down.That’s not what the Chevron doctrine was. The Chevron doctrine stated that courts should defer to agency interpretations of the law.
Only in cases of ambiguity or a gap in the law on record.