• misk@sopuli.xyzOP
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    4 months ago

    I would understand self hosting but those are for-profit entities as well. They might be subject to less regulatory oversight because they’re smaller. They might not have as many resources to keep my data safe. They have benefits for sure but trust is not this easy to judge.

      • misk@sopuli.xyzOP
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        4 months ago

        Based on prcinpipes Bitwarden is an obvious choice. With things like passwords I’m leaning into giving my keys to a company that, if it comes to be, can pay gargantuan ransoms.

    • akilou@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      4 months ago

      The difference is their business model is privacy. Google’s business model is advertising. I’m Proton’s customer, but advertisers are Google’s customers.

      • misk@sopuli.xyzOP
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        edit-2
        4 months ago

        I don’t trust them in general but I’m certain Google doesn’t use my passwords for advertising.

        • Todd Bonzalez@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          4 months ago

          The real issue is that Google stores your passwords in plaintext. That’s why they survive a password reset, or apparently now can be shared with others. Proton and Bitwarden encrypt your passwords so that nobody but you can access them, or at least in the case of Bitwarden, you can share with other users using pre-shared keys.