EDIT: For clarification, I feel that the current situation on the ground in the war (vs. say a year ago) might indicate that an attack on Russia might not result in instant nuclear war, which is what prompted my question. I am well aware of the “instant nuclear Armageddon” opinion.

Serious question. I don’t need to be called stupid. I realize nuclear war is bad. Thanks!

  • Cryophilia@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    29 days ago

    Wait I’m confused. Why would a NATO invasion of Russia destroy the rest of the world? Sure, Russia would be fukd. And if China tried to defend Russia for some insane reason, it would be one heck of a war. But not “entire world falls into anarchy and chaos” levels, that’s absurd.

    • Somethingcheezie@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      edit-2
      29 days ago

      I think the assumption is China would join in with defending Russia for fear that it would be next and alone. I’ll edit this and add Iran to the assumption that they don’t want to be next and alone either.

      China clearing wants more resources and land. China has historical ambitions in Taiwan. China has historical grievances with Japan.