Welp, this didn’t take long.

It’s especially interesting that they laid off a lot of people who were the only ones in their particular job, leaving entire jobs uncovered. I suspect this comes right before shutting them entirely or doing it all “with AI” 🤮.

Sad in particular about Alice Bell. She was fantastic, and it always felt like she kept the site going through all the shit of recent years. Plus being the driving force behind their podcast (the Electronic Wireless Show) of course also spells doom for that one though I hope that like Indiescovery they go rogue and run it independent of the site.

Bleak times. Fuck IGN.

  • Empricorn@feddit.nl
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    4 months ago

    These giant corporations don’t even have to be quiet about it anymore, there’s just no consequences. They couldn’t care less about you, me, their customers, or their employees.

  • Fedizen@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    4 months ago

    Buying out competition and throwing out the workers confident that investors won’t back a small dog against a big one

    In an investor run economy, competition means you might lose a bet. For an investor its better to reduce competition than lose bets. This is originally why anti trust legislation was created: The market needs to be forced to compete or it will amalgamate into a giant blob of noncompeting assets.

    High taxes exist to reduce accumulation of assets and slow down the snowballing effect of huge investors. This is what the trump tax cuts look like.

    • UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      4 months ago

      This is originally why anti trust legislation was created

      If you look at the history of anti-trust legislation, some of its first uses and biggest targets were labor organizers. Under the Sherman Antitrust Act, one of the first and most notable cases was the US lawsuit against the Workingmen’s Amalgamated Council (also known as the “Triple Alliance” of teamsters, scalesmen, and packers) over what was then the largest labor action in US history.

      It wasn’t until the 1914 Clayton Antitrust Act that unions were granted safe harbor from anti-trust provisions. And it took until 1941 for the courts to finally fully decriminalize labor actions - a process that was ultimately reversed starting in the 1960s under Nixon, and extended under Ford, Carter, and then Reagan.

      High taxes exist to reduce accumulation of assets and slow down the snowballing effect of huge investors.

      That’s the Keynesian approach, certainly. But the Chicago School that came to dominate US economics during the Volcker Era suggested instead that we can adjust the Federal Funds rate to keep malinvestment from derailing an economy. And that this strategy means asset accumulation is now safe and profitable for large corporate interests.

      Large investment banks are actually good, because they give us a steady and constant flow of price information on a private market. And since price discovery is the real goal of regulation, the advent of these mega-banks means we can let the institutions regulate themselves without any conceivable downsi- sound of the 2008 market crash

  • daddy32@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    4 months ago

    Oh no, I love Alice :( She just moved, relatively recently…

    I guess I can finally stop reading RPS now.

  • atro_city@fedia.io
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    4 months ago

    We need more worker owned associations and more workers’ rights. This is ridiculous.

    • Goronmon@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      4 months ago

      We also need people to realize that it’s not sustainable to expect free content while running an ad-blocker.

      • atro_city@fedia.io
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        4 months ago

        I disagree. Ads are not the answer. Treating them as such is simply giving up.

        • Goronmon@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          edit-2
          4 months ago

          Agreed, ads are not the answer. Paying for content is the answer.

          But people want their content to be free, while also being angry that their free content contains ads.

          • atro_city@fedia.io
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            4 months ago

            Because content distributors haven’t thought of another way to get money. The only other thing they came up with is subscriptions. Some have thought of donations, but they haven’t banded together to come up with an alternative. It’s weak and totally mid.