• solo@kbin.earth
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    2 months ago

    I suppose greenwashing works? in the sense creates favorable stats, not that it helps the environment.

      • Fushuan [he/him]@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        edit-2
        2 months ago

        Liek the other commenter said, this could be read as 70% of electricity still relyingnon non renewables, which is a bad metric.

        • VirtualOdour@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          2 months ago

          Reasonable people understand that transition is not an overnight process. Also adoption isn’t linear which is why they say the first third is the biggest half.

      • solo@kbin.earth
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        2 months ago

        Obviously I don’t see this as good news because I can’t see how ecology and capitalism can work together, unless it is greenwashing. Environmentalism/ecology/etc want sustainability, capitalism is all about eternal growth of the business, and I don’t see corporations and other financial entities changing their business model? Do you?

        • Cryophilia@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 day ago

          Capitalism is helping destroy fossil fuels. Solar and hydro electricity is cheaper than fossil fuels.

          Government subsidies - interference with he capitalist market - are propping up the oil industry (and the meat industry, while we’re at it).

          Properly regulated capitalism is perfectly capable of fixing the climate crisis. Ecology and capitalism work together when going green is cheaper than using fossil fuels.