While pure Python code should work unchanged, code written in other languages or using the CPython C API may not. The GIL was implicitly protecting a lot of thread-unsafe C, C++, Cython, Fortran, etc. code - and now it no longer does. Which may lead to all sorts of fun outcomes (crashes, intermittent incorrect behavior, etc.).
:tabclose
The Rust hype at least makes sense.
In technical context, yes. I’m a Rustacean myself.
In business/marketing context, …
It’s not you who needs it.
It’s for buzzword chasers and cost cutters.
Rust (=> fast and hip)
Shared (=> outsourced)
AI generated (=> robot devs)
Get it?
A reminder that the Servo project has resumed active development since the start of 2023, and is making good progress every month.
If you’re looking for a serious in-progress effort to create a new open, safe, performant, independent, and fully-featured web engine, that’s the one you should be keeping an eye on.
It won’t be easy trying to catch up to continuously evolving and changing web standards, but that’s the only effort with a chance.
I have no specific knowledge of this stuff. But the generic answer is an obvious one.
However Python code does it can be replicated in Rust.
For example, if python code executes the driver as a subprocess, then that too can be done in Rust.
So checking how Python code does it will probably lead to an answer to this question.
Maybe ask a web dev community about this.
There could be something better written in Rust.
There could be something better NOT written in Rust.
They should know.
Good. But a lot of us do this already:
[target.x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu]
linker = "clang" # for mold
rustflags = ["-c", "link-arg=-fuse-ld=/usr/bin/mold"]
[target.x86_64-unknown-linux-musl]
rustflags = ["-Z", "gcc-ld=lld"]
Not based on, but built on top of Iced.
The fork wouldn’t be that different from whatever upstream Iced snapshot it last synced with. There are two major, if peripheral, changes still. A renderer for some Wayland special needs, and some integrated accessibility support. At least that was the case until a few weeks ago. I don’t think anything significant changed since.
So the Iced API itself is largely the same. However, since this is built on top of Iced. COSMIC apps are more inclined to use abstractions and tools from libcosmic wherever applicable instead of using Iced API directly. But you still see plenty of direct Iced API use.
What’s needed is renewed ethos, not just fresh blood.
What’s needed is people who actually like the projects, on the technical level, and use them daily. Not people who are just trying to maintain an open-source “portfolio” they can showcase in pursuit of landing big corpo job.
A “portfolio” which also needs to, in their mind, project certain culture war prioritizations and positionings that are fully inline with the ones corpos are projecting.
It will be interesting to see how much of the facade of morality will remain if these corpo projections change, or when the corpo priorities and positionings, by design, don’t care, at best, about little unimportant stuff like American-uniparty-assisted genocide! We got to see murmurs of that in the last few months.
Will the facade be exposed, or will it simply change face? What if a job was on the line?
I’m reminded of a certain person with the initials S.K, who was a Rust official, and a pretend Windows-user in hopes of landing a Microsoft job (he pretty much said as much). He was also a big culture-war-style moral posturer. And a post-open-source world hypothesiser.
Was it weird for such a supposed moral “progressive” to be a big nu-Microsoft admirer? and one who used his position to push for the idea that anyone who maintained a classical open-source/free-software position towards Microsoft is a fanatic? No, it wasn’t. He was one of many after all.
All these things go hand in hand. And if you think this is a derailing comment that went way off the rails, then I hope you maintain the same position about the effects of all this on the open-source and free-software world itself.