Also monarchy. You guillotine a king and the monarchy instantly jumps to the next one.

Democracy requires nonviolence

HAHAHAHA oh damn my dude go and read any history book.

Haven’t seen any prominent lib even use violent rhethoric in connection with pointing out Trump’s dangerous plans for his second term, so I was surprised you bring up stochastic terrorism.

That’s precisely how stochastic terrorism works, the big wigs never straight up call for it to have their hands clean just in case, for that they have their tabloids, their agitators, their media heads, their internet trolls. And btw Biden did said they need to put Trump into the bullseye (though he most likely didn’t meant it literally, but on the other hand he promised to get rid of Nordstream back in the day and it happened).

I agree that democratic processes have little to do with US politics these days, but are you suggesting you can promote democratic values with anything outside living them (not that US politician do that, but in principle).

In principle i do but i don’t see liberal democracy as desirable version of it due to it being in service of the small minority of capitalists and their stooges exploiting workers, and as such the system works exactly according to its values. I just think those real values behind that system are abhorrent.

And it shouldn’t matter where I’m from. The disaster that is the US empires fall is of global interest.

What SUPAVILLAIN said. If you’re not part of the abovementioned minority or their stooge you should be dearly interested in end of the US empire.

On a side note what is @welppp.com and why it’s all over the modlog

Vivec you damn usurper don’t you dare speak about gods angry Azura noises

I didn’t even suggested you people should murder him*, just pointed how calling him enemy of democracy, second coming of Hitler and constantly droning about having to stop him is a call for stochastic terrorism, but you clearly understood it like this so the feedback checks out.

Also lmao fucking hell you call US president election mechanism “democratic”? And i won’t comment on US “democratic values”.

Wait you aren’t even Usian lmao you absolute clown.

*FYI Marxists-Leninists usually think political assassinations are futile adventurism, since it won’t change the conditions that created people like Trump. Which won’t mean we wouln’t be glad if some ghoul get offed.

That’s why when throwing things at US president you should use something with more AOE

You libs drone all the time in every media how the guy is an enemy of democracy, second coming of Hitler and needs to be stopped for any price. Yet you are “revolted” when someone taken it seriously.

Some parts definitely are always ready

“Breaking news: Stoltenberg bashes tectonic plates for aggressive movements”

Said guy with twitter bot username.

Fun fact: He and his brother played in a very popular children movie when they were 12. But: first, they didn’t had voices there, they were dubbed by professional actresses; and second, the movie was about what they later perfected: stealing.

Nato wasn’t defense coalition even in the Cold War. You just need to look at calendar to see which bloc was formed as a response to which. Also, NATO country was attacked literally one single time and NATO didn’t even intervened because they have a special exception in the rules so they can freely wage colonial wars. I won’t even mention how many times NATO countries were agressors compared to that one single time.

I’ll take the downvotes.

So SpaceX was “successful”

Also don’t forget government funds

Teachers and social workers

NATO allies are discussing

Which ones?

NATO officials are discussing

Which ones?

What a lousy article, you can’t know if it’s the proposition talked by the important people or some nutjobs from Baltics like usual in case of such idiocy, or maybe it’s just a journo duck.

The one where there is not only zero proof of anything of it being real, but also zero (or nearly zero) religious people actually beliving that.

Cringy shit looking medal for cringy shit politician.

Sure that’s a valid defintion, albeit a super specific one and it directly exclude all (or almost all) known forms of religion on Earth.