Prevent 9/11 probably unrealistic, but you could pull the fire alarm prior to the attack and thereby save lifes

You could walk in there and pull the fire alarm

The Suffering in my Ass or Jaws in my ass, can’t remember which one it was

Women are so good to me ist ein paar Jahre alt aber auch sehr schön geworden and I don’t have to go back and I don’t want it is what I said in my phone and the underlying question was not to be fair. (The German part in between translated to: “it’s (no gender included) a few years old but turned out beautifully”

Let then then, it’s nice and cool in the morgue and with some luck you can become an undead

That’s a noun hence Kapital is written with a capital K

You’re missing a "c, but I got you covered * hands a c *

It’s a plain bird

Thats were it gets tricky in reality. But not necessarily in an exam that prioritises theoretical criminal knowledge

Annoying some is thankfully not a criminal action.

Yes prove intent, but depending on the legal system that might not be enough. Say I believe that spraying someone with sparkling water on the beach would kill you, that does not necessarily mean you attempted to take someones life. Similarly hurting someone in sports does not mean you assaulted them in a criminal sense.

Wait till you hear about countries closing linguistic institutions for being spy agencies.

That honestly is a very interesting subject for a beginners exam to criminal law

Yes but a morel does not have a porous underside, hence I’d be careful anyway. As for chanterelles, I feel like you don’t really have much room to mistake it for something else. However it’s been sometime since I went into the woods and I’ve always disliked the English naming for mushrooms and basically don’t know any in English

I live in Europe. Just go by the rule of thumb, if you’re unsure, do not eat. Does it have a porous underside, if yes, most of the times edible. Does it have lamelles, if yes, be careful. Apart from the very dangerous ones, that you should know. If you’re a bit knowledgeable, take a pinch and put it in your tongue, if it’s spicy or stinging, it’s not edible. Is it neutral, it’s likely to be edible. If you go by that order you should be fine. Never forget number 1 though.

Yes, Willy Brandt, former chancellor of Germany for amending the post-war relationship with Central and Eastern Europe. He’s most famous for kneeling in front of the memorial for the Warsaw Ghetto while he was Chancellor.

You apparently have a shitty mushroom guide.

Frankly speaking, I see no actual chance of communism or even just socialism happening in my lifetime, hence I’d rather focus my remaining brain capacity on something that actually seems feasible.

It is not a finite solution but it is what it is.

Look I’d actually support socialism or at least strong social-capitalism. Just wanna make that clear.

Arguing certain things worked way better during the GDR does not at all refute my point of it not being a democracy apart from on paper. Child care for one worked incomparably better than it now does. Privatisation and more importantly the dissolvement of companies did not go well and is certainly still a problem. Actually it caused neo-feudalism in parts of the former GDR.

Stalin being officially reproachable does not actually mean he was reproachable. The kind of socialism the USSR practiced is in my opinion not all better than a well restricted capitalism. But to be fair, that is subjective and I am financially not in any kind of trouble.

It was not meant to be racist, the history of violence in Russia since I am vaguely aware of its history, does speak of itself. Certainly in the years since the founding of the RF, has violence among the people and state-sanctioned been a common thing. The wide-spread unrestricted violence can be openly observed in Ukraine. If you look at any macro-violense theories you see my point proven. All and I mean all factors for mass-violence are fulfilled.

Also if anything, my comment was xenophobic, racism is something different

Technically Belarus and Russia are democracies