TIL

https://wiki.opensourceecology.org/wiki/4_freedoms

These are the 4 Freedoms of open source software - which OSE applies to open source hardware and other products in general. These are the freedoms to inspect, use, modify, and sell.

> The freedom to inspect or view. In software, this came from the freedom to study how the program works, and change it to make it do what you wish . Access to the source code is a precondition for this - such as FreeCAD files, text documents, spreadsheets, calculations, instructions, etc.
The freedom to use. Run or otherwise execute the software, product, or process. You may be charged for using the thing. But this is a moot point, because as soon as someone buys it, it can be released for free.
The freedom to modify. This is a big point: making improvements or adaptation is a key to distributing value.
Economic freedom. The freedom to distribute or sell. Freedom distribute copies of your modified versions to others. By doing this you can give the whole community a chance to benefit from your changes. Access to the source code is a precondition for this. 

What’s the pushback against it? I like that you can modify and publish version of it as long as it’s noncommercial

Edit: I don’t understand the down votes, I’m trying to learn - what are the downsides of this thatkmake so unpopular?

Are you an expert tho

Lisan al Gaib

Anecdotally, so far I’ve noticed cars getting louder

Exacerbate = the rare minerals issue?

I also don’t trust them that they won’t sell my data if I pay them

Not at all actually, maybe for my parents

Been using buckwheat pillows since I was a kid, they’re awesome

Do you game with friends? If so, what do you use instead of discord?

Hopefully they’ll do a freemium service at some point like Proton does

Closest I’ve gotten ti a link is this https://www.tiktok.com/discover/idaho-book-ban-graduation

Edit: found a video on dailymotion https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-13478661/Annabelle-Jenkins-Idaho-graduation-Handmaids-tale-book-ban.html

I feel like “threat model” can distance people away from privacy communities, i.e. thinking you need a threat to get privacy. I certainly avoid using it because of that opinion. I wish there was a more approachable non-security term for it, like “data priority” or something like that.

Again, just my opinion and how I react to hearing “threat model” (as a privacy advocate myself).