People behind ISO 216 thought of everyting
how to make a good standard:
step 1: copy from DIN
People behind ISO 216 thought of everyting
how to make a good standard:
step 1: copy from DIN
because of two bodies can not occupy the same space, the feather and the ball will be in different position when you drop them. And therefor gravitation will pull the earth slightly more toward the ball and slightly less toward the feather.
how does it compare to yt-dlp?
Most Adobe tools don’t have any good free alternatives even for home use.
inkscape is on a level with illustrator (maybe even better)
for drawing: try krita
if you want to pay money (much much less than for adobe): Affinity is on a level with fotoshop
source:
- Careful citation practices will build your credibility as a scientist or scholar.
https://falconediting.com/en/blog/6-reasons-why-citation-of-sources-is-important-when-writing/
providing source is good form in every context
offtopic: what is the significance of the reblogger in the screenshot? like, why didn’t they leave the top third of the picture in?
Latex: Problem --> \def\please@#1#2#3#4{\e@kill#2#3{\me#1}#4@now}
-->
do you awkwardly go to people at work and say “thank you for being my friend”?
is there a lemmy version of r/thathappened yet?
oh, I totally agree with you.
In fact standards are made to be copied. That’s like the entire point of them.