![](/static/253f0d9b/assets/icons/icon-96x96.png)
![](https://lemm.ee/pictrs/image/0369942a-29fe-4b84-ad6b-a96db98db021.jpeg)
How else can you make it look like a linear grouping?
How else can you make it look like a linear grouping?
I would even consider watching it of they covered it!
I’m more surprised by them referring to it as the fourth instalment at all.
This movie is supposedly a reboot, so not part of the same storyline as the previous three.
Yet, that is what those words seem to communicate.
Marketing? Sloppy writing?
Pre-Madonna, I think.
Having read it again not too long ago, I was actually surprised by how much of it was not good.
The framework was interesting, but much of the actual writing wasn’t nearly as good as I had thought.
Maybe it’s because I had read it in a Dutch translation the first couple of times, and the translator had had improved the prose without intending to, or maybe it’s because it was many years ago.
Whatever the reason, I felt like it needed another pass of the editor.
The movie, on the other hand, still thrills me every time I see it.
A mention is not the same as an appearance, so the discrepancy for some characters could be even greater if you take that into account.