Good thinking. So we could add:

• social media mentions
• # of [new] subscribers who [first/]only watch/binge a given show

You’re welcome, Nuclear Noel

270toWin, Rasmussen, RealClearPolitics, and fivethirtyeight

LOL lmk what your psych says about that

When you try it, make sure it’s in a domain where there is some chance of starting an international conflict

Very true. Mentioned this elsewhere someone suggestion a large watermark:

I went a different route, though I avoided placing the callout somewhere it may be accidentally cropped.

I hope the, uh, non-disinformation can have a simple start here, and if we’re big enough some day that kind of thing is a problem maybe we re-adjust. Of course, nothing stopping someone from recreating something to their less-scrupulous heart’s delight. (in the case someone is re-creating something to intentionally mislead, not re-creating based on their expectations of people’s knowledge and BS meters)

Ahh just can’t wait for the proliferation of high-quality generated videos…

Any idea of the recidivism rates vs. us here in the United Prison Industrial Complex of America?

That is crap. What-ifs don’t benefit you directly like that.

What do you mean?

snoopy

When it comes to violence, I pretty much stop at the headlines. Watched brutal videos many years ago & I’m set for a lifetime on the bulk of true crime and also fictional violence.

I was actually wondering if materials could be released in a limited fashion: send an application, go to a reading room… try to avoid leaks but still let people get science done or whatnot.

Monkey wing nut?

It’s funny how as soon as something is either invisible or disconnected by time from something else, it suddenly is a matter of belief for some people.

I’m glad we don’t hear debates about whether it is possible for an internal combustion engine to power a motor vehicle at highway speeds.

I went a different route, though I avoided placing the callout somewhere it may be accidentally cropped.

I hope the, uh, non-disinformation can have a simple start here, and if we’re big enough some day that kind of thing is a problem maybe we re-adjust. Of course, nothing stopping someone from recreating something to their less-scrupulous heart’s delight. (in the case someone is re-creating something to intentionally mislead, not re-creating based on their expectations of people’s knowledge and BS meters)

Ahh just can’t wait for the proliferation of high-quality generated videos…

You were the change today

Hey @[email protected] - loved the post.

After sharing my concerns and receiving affirmational feedback, I have made a very small edit to this image.

Please consider using Lemmy’s awesome image hot swap feature to update the image. You may simply tap edit and paste the following link:

https://sh.itjust.works/pictrs/image/0b64e0dc-3e66-4e0c-81b1-953bdb42b002.jpeg

If there any mods reading through here, I might suggest a rule asking folks to use their best judgment to include a similar indicator in similar circumstances.

I’m not much of an “/s” guy, but I think these six letters (parody) can avoid misleading without ruining the fun :)

Not dying:

Maybe my would-be killer gets caught because their psychologist studied the killer’s writings and noticed a troubling pattern.

Guy wants to kill me. Guy complains about me to their therapist without mentioning killing me. Therapist thinks “wait, this sounds like something I’ve read…”

And what they read was some lunatic’s writings that were released. Therapist is then able to report their concerns via appropriate channels and medicates my would-be killer, and I live another day.

Maybe my would-be killer gets caught because their psychologist studied the killer’s writings and noticed a troubling pattern.

I don’t want even more manifestos glorified and memed on 4chan. I’m cognizant there’s generally a reason horrible things see the light of the public eye.

Body cam footage of someone’s worst moments of their life… release it, violate one person’s privacy, keep one officer/department accountable, public has to weigh that tradeoff.

Even releasing lottery winners’ names ruins lives, but otherwise some would assume the lottery’s fraudulent (money going to politicians’ friends)… instead of just a tax on the poor 🌈

Thanks :)

I’m wondering about precedent. With my “if”, think “how would courts rule if in a future case …” or “how would we feel …”

(commented a little more in this thread as well)

Which is why this case might feel fair to plenty of people. If you’re allowed to sign over an estate, though, and you sign it over to someone with a profit motive, maybe you’re allowed to essentially sell evidence the public is normally entitled to.

I made a step by step guide to disable OnStar on my 2022 Bolt. Easy to do, not permanent, and doesn’t disable the cellphone, Bluetooth, GPS, compass, or hands free microphone.

-source via a private proxy to that other site

If the killer’s parents were approached by Fox/TMZ who wanted to turn just a few pages into some whacko documentary, would it be right to withhold the rest of the lunatic ramblings?

IDK how to feel about this, just know it’s weird

Second shortest coastline in the world after Monaco

Link

Earlier post