You said Hamas hides behind children, which is why you wholeheartedly disagree with Israel being morally worse than people who are not Hamas based on children killing. I have no other way to interpret that besides you thinking its OK to kill kids as long as Israel is targeting terrorists who might be hiding there.

So in your mind, it’s totally cool to murder innocent women, men, and children as long as there is a chance that terrorists who are currently hiding might possibly be killed in the process?

A violent crime can be anything from punching another kid in highschool (remember, they are 17 and highschool boys fight sometimes) to murder.

Those are two words that should never be put next to each other.

No, this is a calculated move. Her brain isn’t mush. She just lacks sympathy for others and is willing to sell her soul for a guaranteed financial future.

Not good for anyone. This will hurt Iran, because the US will be stupid enough to defend Israel. This will hurt Palestinians, because the US will send more shit to Israel that will be used against Palestinians. This will hurt Israeli terrorists (slightly). This will hurt Israeli civilians who oppose the genocide.

China also escalates through funding of regimes. Without China stabilizing Russia’s economy (and a little help from India), Russia might have collapsed under sanctions by now.

Just because Labour wasn’t in power doesn’t mean people weren’t unhappy with them. I remember watching the news interviews at the time, and some of the people who voted to Exit said they didn’t really want to Exit they just wanted to put out a protest vote against Corbyn. Also, polls showed at the time that only 52% of Labour voters thought Labour was in favor of Remain, so there was generally bad messaging by Labour.

Look, you can argue that the single issue is so important it should take precedence, but the end result of not voting for Harris means… even more genocide! So go ahead and single issue vote on something that will get you more of what you don’t want. Anyone voting for Stein in a swing state is either someone who gains something from the 3rd party getting more votes, or is someone who doesn’t understand the implications of a Trump presidency. If you live in CA or AL or OK or NY, sure, protest against Harris.

Also, I like how you blame the Democrats for Trump winning when the people actually voted. The people deserve some blame for the consequence of their actions. Yes, Clinton was a shitty candidate who I predicted losing because everyone hates her so much… but in the end there were a lot of people who are now worse off because they decided it would be better to vote for Stein.

Eh, he never bet on any games he was involved with (according to him, and MLB never claimed they had proof he did). Sure, ban him from playing anymore, but the dude is a legend of the game and deserves to be in the Hall of Fame. I’m pretty sure the reason they never relented was because he was an asshole that nobody liked.

It’s almost like being a single issue voter is moronic.

Also, protest votes only hurt everyone and help nobody in a voting system like we have. Look at Brexit: most of those were protest votes against Labour, not actual votes for Brexit. Or look at the votes for Jill Stein in Michigan, where she got more votes than Clinton lost by. Every pregnant woman in the US is at higher risk now because of those protest votes.

I don’t know, if I already lived in a tiny town that nobody ever heard of I wouldn’t mind getting 10 years of free cable in exchange for living in the exact small town that is now called DISH. Who the hell even cares at that point?

And it isn’t like they changed the name of a city/town with a rich history steeped in tradition. The town of Clark was only incorporated in the year 2000 by a guy named Clark and only had 201 inhabitants at the time.

We have shown no evidence of them doing this, so have to do it ourselves to show it is a problem.

EDIT: If they are just registering voters and mailing in their legal votes, then I don’t see any problem with them doing this.

There’s “don’t be fucking stupid,” and also “don’t send tourist dollars to a country that cheers their deaths,” as well as “don’t legitimize this host-country choice by FIFA.”

White? Check.

Nominated by GW Bush? Check.

Looks EXACTLY like the stereotypical Southern racist redneck? Check.

In a better world, the cops would have laughed it off with you and then went right to the woman who reported it and charged her with… something? She didn’t file a false report, and she isn’t interfering with a case. Maybe interfering with the officers in their duty or something? She clearly lied and wasted everyone’s time.

I know there are reasons to allow targeted hunting of wolves in some areas. I don’t know if I agree with the reasons, but I’m also not a rancher in that area and don’t know the full impact on either side of the issue.

However, I feel like intentionally running over any animal is a step in the wrong direction.

“Do you think it’s the clearly sick looking person in a gown standing outside the building labeled a medical facility with a handrolled cigarette that smells like weed?”

“Nah, that’s just someone who is buying weed from them.”

“Doctors are just a bunch of overeducated assholes who think they are smarter than everyone else. What could they possibly be doing with all that electricity?”

• LAPD probably

Google glass failed for many reasons, but I don’t think privacy was one of them. Price and usefulness were the two big reasons. Tech has advanced a lot in 10 years, so the usefulness and video quality has definitely advanced; but the ratio of price to usefulness is probably not right yet.

I couldn’t find that option when I bought this game on PS5 last year or whenever it came out.