I agree with the premise that OP may have an agenda. But let’s be real - you pointing that out is an ad hominem attack.
What if it’s Manchin or Sinema?
Ok! Will do.
What’s an example of this?
Edit: I just saw the video’s description and the related content section.
Hm. Kinda weird.
Are going to, you say?
Already happened, friend.
Or did you forget what a shitshow Trump’s first term was?
People literally died because of him.
Yeah right.
The only super power in the world “in need of external help.”
We dug ourselves into this hellhole, we must get ourselves out of it
Couldn’t an AI do the same?
And disclaimer, I’m not a fan of the current iteration of “AIs.” I’m just trying to understand why coding and testing would be an issue if done by some tool.
That doesn’t make sense.
You’re just repeating yourself without answering the question.
Nah brah. I’m not subscribed to this community, and yet sometimes its contents pop up in my feed. And I don’t want to sit through some video to learn about the content of the post.
So I appreciate when someone saves me a click.
Hm, but isn’t usually the same developer who writes the code and the test?
Why would it be an issue if an AI does the same?
Why is this garbage in a science community?
Where’s the study? The experiments? The research?
Independence issue?
I’m all for Biden, but c’mon.
Haha yeah, I see how that could be entertaining.
But eh.
This is off-topic.
That’s a red herring. I don’t care about the original post because, like you pointed out, it’s about entertainment, not science.
Back to the original question I asked the parent poster, I’d like to know what value would bring two experienced astronauts debating a flat earth argument.
Um… yes?
For millennia.
This is nothing new.
The human race is not dying lol! Per evolutionary theory, it’s skiing quite well. Billions of us on Earth right now - and counting!
Let’s not forget that he golfed a lot as well.