In the mid 20th-century, people reliably got more petty bourgeois as they got older.
https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0261379422000452
You r so inspirational
[upvote my comment if you think that’s a bad reason to ban]
was in 1990s tv too
drop a martial art if it is failing to harm anyone.
tired campism
This might be intersting to you – he talks about the difference between philosophical Daoism (like the Daodejing) and religious Daoism (the “weird decorum” you mention). Also this
What are your thoughts on inner martial arts?
I’ll let my fists do the thinking on this.
when you input something into an LLM and regenerate the responses a few times, it can come up with outputs of completely opposite (and equally incorrect) meaning
Can you paste an example of this error?
As you’re trying to make a link between [using neural nets to research plasma control for fusion] and [Biden is a Maoist], I have no.reason to take you seriously.
Right. Like if I were talking to someone in total delirium and their responses were random and not a good fit for the question.
LLMs are not like that.
That’s the least plausible slippery-slope argument I have heard this month.
Like if I go to Journal of Fusion Energy – https://link.springer.com/journal/10894 – the latest article is titled ‘Artificial Neural Network-Based Tomography Reconstruction of Plasma Radiation Distribution at GOLEM Tokamak’ and the 4th-latest is ‘Deep Learning Based Surrogate Model a fast Soft X-ray (SXR) Tomography on HL-2 a Tokamak’. I am sorry if that upsets you but that’s the way the field is.
That’s just cosmetic stuff. Why care about what words people use?
I’m mostly answering the question I was asked: what are some examples of technical research in the field.
How can we solve plasma control without AI? And why exclude that tool?
They can functionally understand a good portion of it.
e.g. I can input a meme plus the words “explain this meme” and it can output an explanation.
Step One: acquire one-hundred human necks using hatchet and/or hacksaw