We heard you like Windows apps…
We heard you like Windows apps…
Neither the MacTrast nor the original 9to5 article discusses the security behind Apple’s iOS implementation. But we know all firmware packages are signed and I would imagine this would be no different, with the recovery partition OS performing a check of the signature.
No but JD Vance was visiting just a few hours earlier
Look at Samsung’s history. This is their MO, it’s how they became the Samsung we know today - straight up steal actual product designs, not just concepts, not just copy closely, a compete steal, and sell until arrested.
Search “samsung employees swallow evidence”
Fun times.
It’s just crazy though because the modern Republican Party has become fascist. The very enemy that used to unite us all towards a better good against such evil.
This guy calculates
That’s because half the population actually believes they’ll be as rich as those high tax brackets (which will never happen).
Dam, you both sound right. And that’s some sad shit to realize.
You are absolutely right. I’ve corrected the mistake.
JD Vance is a weird-ass, mother couch fuckin’ piece of shit
That’s actually a good question. Surely Mastodon and Lemmy instances should have also seen an uptick in registrations?
Seems like it’s not as cut and dry as the headline suggests.
According to Apple, there’s more to this story, and it thinks it made the correct decision. The iPhone maker said Appstun’s app repeatedly tried to mislead users into thinking that it offered features and functionality that it didn’t support and also marketed the app with deceptive ads, leading to negative app ratings and reviews.
Among the complaints from end users was that the custom animations or images didn’t work like real watch faces as they had hoped.
“I bought this to get what looks like a Rolex watch face … it’s not a face it’s just a picture … hands don’t even move,” wrote one customer. “Does this company have permission from Rolex to do this? I took it they did but I doubt it. Pure scam to get money from people. I want a refund it’s not acceptable. I will also report to Rolex and see if they do anything.”
I’m willing to believe that maybe the developers were trying to build an app that really did work like a watch face with more features, but simply didn’t have it fully baked before submitting. Then it seems as though they went all in on pushing it through anyway and possibly paying for fake reviews.
Multiple complaints in the reviews indicated the app didn’t offer the watch faces it advertised and others questioned how the app could have 4.4 stars when so many of the written reviews were negative complaints.
Sounds like some bad management choices at best. At worst, they were negligent and fraudulent with their product offering.
This is extremely dangerous to our democracy
I’m sorry, Bruce. These boys get that syrup in them, they get a little antsy in their pantsy. You just can’t keep them under control.
Just out of curiosity, are you an Apple user, looking for alternatives to Apple’s AppStore?
WD, in turn, claimed the firm had not infringed Suess’ patents
So did they or didn’t they infringe? The article doesn’t say. I imagine MRT disassembled some drives to examine for infringement.
It is also possible that these hundreds of employees across the globe working R&D for Western Digital may have developed the same, or nearly the same, technology. But then MRT filed first if they were awarded the patient.
Given the track record of memory and other computer parts manufactures, I would say it’s more likely that they’re simply lying through their teeth.
That’s just pedophilia with extra steps
They’re not just sure, they’re Internet sure!
I’d say keep it