![](/static/253f0d9b/assets/icons/icon-96x96.png)
![](https://lemmy.world/pictrs/image/454d735b-63c0-4f59-87b2-5b88cd5e6c72.png)
What I would not like is for a parent to pay for the upgraded seat next to me and then I get bumped to accommodate their child.
What I would not like is for a parent to pay for the upgraded seat next to me and then I get bumped to accommodate their child.
Since I’m considered less invested in the community if I don’t have children, I shouldn’t have to pay property taxes, since that money is used to fund public schools. And whatever federal portion of the budget that goes toward public education should be given back to me as well.
Also, does a parent’s extra vote go away when the children reach voting age?
Edit: The more I think about this, the more I like it. I think you’re on the right track, but we need to take this further. You have a greater stake, therefore you should have a larger tax burden as well. You and your family will use more resources than a single person. Roads wear out faster from more driving and increased weight of vehicle. Larger families require larger police and fire departments. Etc., etc. Good idea.
We’ll have to see how comprehensive Apple’s trail maps are. AllTrails has maps for many state and local parks. Gaia has extensive trail information for international hiking trails.
This was a promotion with Sapporo when Microsoft launched Windows 95.
Ron Paul must be crushed. How will his campaign recover from this devastating blow?