• Funderpants @lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      13
      ·
      edit-2
      3 days ago

      Yes but now he can be even more explicit about it, put it right in official communications.

    • jonne@infosec.pub
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      3 days ago

      And wasn’t it basically already legal? I don’t think there’s a lot of regulation around it (at least as codified in law, I know in the last few decades presidents deferred to a vetting process through DOJ, but none of that is mandatory).

      • Boddhisatva@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        3 days ago

        The president’s power to pardon federal crimes is not really limited in the constitution except to exclude cases of impeachment. That is generally accepted to mean that the power of the pardon is otherwise nearly unlimited except perhaps that one cannot pardon oneself. There is no specific rule or law against giving a pardon in exchange for payment, though it is clearly considered by most as unethical.

        • Zak@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          edit-2
          3 days ago

          There is no specific rule or law against giving a pardon in exchange for payment

          Yes there is: 18 USC § 201 (b) (2).

          Granting the pardon isn’t the part that’s illegal; soliciting or receiving the payment in exchange is. The ruling doesn’t change that, but could make the prosecution of that act more difficult in certain edge cases.