• Buffalox@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    94
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    edit-2
    1 month ago

    These limitations on Ukraine really need to be lifted. Ukraine needs freedom to attack the best strategic targets they can, whether they are in Ukraine occupied areas or in Russia. Since Russia annexed the occupied territories, there’s not a big difference anyway.

    • NaibofTabr@infosec.pub
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      arrow-down
      63
      ·
      1 month ago

      The only problem I see is that it’s escalatory. If Ukraine starts using Western-supplied weapons for offensive operations, this situation goes from supplying war material for defense (under-the-table proxy war) to full-on overt proxy war. Russia will spin this as “NATO is using Ukraine to attack us” (though they’re probably doing that already).

      I can’t see how this won’t lead to a wider conflict.

        • NaibofTabr@infosec.pub
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          6
          arrow-down
          31
          ·
          1 month ago

          I’m sure you’re right.

          How do we use our understanding of that, and the way that they operate, to avoid a full scale war?

          • Just_Pizza_Crust@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            40
            ·
            1 month ago

            There IS a full scale war going on. 31,000 confirmed dead Ukranian soldiers, and up to 120,000 dead Russian soldiers. We don’t even have a good idea how many civilian deaths, but the total death toll could be as high as 500,000.

            And no, before you start - Mutually Assured Destruction isn’t “a full scale war”. Its Annihilation of both sides, and has no precedent in the history of war.

              • mommykink@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                15
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                1 month ago

                Putin can’t even hold his own territory. I don’t think even he would open another front by attacking a NATO member even if the west started greenlighting their weapons be used in the incursion.

              • 5in1k@lemm.ee
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                5
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                1 month ago

                If Nato got involved directly Moscow would be leveled in a month.

          • Dremor@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            20
            ·
            edit-2
            1 month ago

            We already crossed many times their “red lines”. This is just the good old “China’s Final Warning”.

            They are already barely managing to slowly advance against a single foe, which is still transitioning between the old soviet warfare ways toward NATO’s one, with far less soldiers, I doubt they would ever hold against the full alliance firepower.

      • FelixCress@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        17
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 month ago

        The only problem I see is that it’s escalatory

        Wasn’t invading Ukraine escalatory in the first place?

      • Pistcow@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        16
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 month ago

        K. Russia cant even defend itself from Ukraine. Lets transition to the find out stage.

      • Todd Bonzalez@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        1 month ago

        Russia is Already losing to U.S. weapons being used by Ukraine. Do you really think they want to find out what U.S. weapons used by the U.S. feels like?